Mahlberg v Sun [2021] NSWCATAP 38
The alleged error in the amount of arrears was not an error of law. There was no substantial miscarriage of justice, as it was open to the Tribunal to prefer the Landlord's Ledger (a business record) over the appellant's spreadsheet. The criteria for leave to appeal were not satisfied.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal / Decision on Leave to Appeal and Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['rental Arrears' 'residential Tenancies Act 2010 (nsw)' 'appeal on Amount of Arrears' 'leave to Appeal' 'tribunal Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Decision on Leave to Appeal and Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal erred in calculating the amount of rental arrears as $15,000 instead of $13,600' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted in circumstances where the alleged error would not constitute an error of law']
Ratio Decidendi
The alleged error in the amount of arrears was not an error of law. There was no substantial miscarriage of justice, as it was open to the Tribunal to prefer the Landlord's Ledger (a business record) over the appellant's spreadsheet. The criteria for leave to appeal were not satisfied.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is refused.' 'The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment