Merkoreh v State Parole Authority [2021] NSWSC 371
Section 155 of CASA does not apply to the SPA's refusal to bring forward consideration of parole for manifest injustice; only substantive refusals of parole are reviewable under s 155, and the information relied on by SORC is not shown to be false, misleading or irrelevant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 155 of the Crimes (administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (nsw) / Final Judgment (dismissal)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['parole' 'statutory Interpretation' 'judicial Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 155 of the Crimes (administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (nsw) / Final Judgment (dismissal)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether information from SORC is false, misleading or irrelevant within the meaning of s 155 of CASA' 'Whether refusal to bring forward consideration of parole is a refusal to grant parole under s 155(1)(a)' 'Whether CASA and its Regulation permit early consideration of parole for a serious offender when SORC opposes release']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 155 of CASA does not apply to the SPA's refusal to bring forward consideration of parole for manifest injustice; only substantive refusals of parole are reviewable under s 155, and the information relied on by SORC is not shown to be false, misleading or irrelevant.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application pursuant to s 155 of the Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW) is dismissed.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment