Mitchell v Clayton Utz & Ors [2009] NSWADT 266
Leave to proceed is granted for those aspects of Mr Mitchell’s complaints that raise arguable issues of detriment and discrimination under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), where factual disputes exist about alleged conduct and its relationship to the protected characteristics, and denied where complaints lack substance, relate to lawful conduct, or do not establish required elements under the Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Complaint Under Anti Discrimination Act 1977 (nsw) / Leave Hearing—application for Leave to Proceed
- Outcome
- Leave partially granted, partially refused
- Legal Topics
- ['disability Discrimination' 'sexual Harassment' 'sex Discrimination' 'victimisation' 'leave to Proceed' 'detriment' 'fairness and Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Complaint Under Anti Discrimination Act 1977 (nsw) / Leave Hearing—application for Leave to Proceed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted for complaints of disability discrimination, sexual harassment, sex discrimination and victimisation under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977' 'Whether the alleged conduct amounted to detriment and discrimination' 'The test for granting leave to proceed under s 96(1) of the Act']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to proceed is granted for those aspects of Mr Mitchell’s complaints that raise arguable issues of detriment and discrimination under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), where factual disputes exist about alleged conduct and its relationship to the protected characteristics, and denied where complaints lack substance, relate to lawful conduct, or do not establish required elements under the Act.
Court Disposition
Leave partially granted, partially refused
Orders
- ["Leave is granted for the following complaints or parts of complaints to proceed: (a) the complaint of disability discrimination against Clayton Utz relating to Ms Rutz' questioning of Mr Mitchell in meetings on 22 June 2007 and 19 July 2007 so far as those questions relate to Mr Mitchell's medical history and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment