O’Neill v Piscopo (No 2) [2011] FCA 774
The draft supplementary notice of appeal was not in a satisfactory form and did not sufficiently particularise the grounds of appeal in a manner which would justify allowing it to go forward. Directions were made for a further draft and costs ordered against the appellant for the day's hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Directions Prior to Substantive Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- Directions made; matter stood over; costs order against appellant; no final disposition of appeal merits.
- Legal Topics
- ['trustee Conduct' 'leave to Appeal' 'summary Dismissal' 'bankruptcy Act S 179']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Directions Prior to Substantive Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether appeal should be summarily dismissed as incompetent or showing no reasonably arguable case' 'Whether grounds of appeal adequately particularised error by Federal Magistrates Court in not directing inquiry under s 179 of Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted with respect to refusal to make order under s 179' 'Appropriateness and content of supplementary notice of appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
The draft supplementary notice of appeal was not in a satisfactory form and did not sufficiently particularise the grounds of appeal in a manner which would justify allowing it to go forward. Directions were made for a further draft and costs ordered against the appellant for the day's hearing.
Court Disposition
Directions made; matter stood over; costs order against appellant; no final disposition of appeal merits.
Orders
- ['The appellant file a further draft supplementary notice of appeal no later than 12 July 2011.' 'The question of whether leave to appeal should be granted in respect of the refusal to make an order under s 179 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) be stood over to the hearing of the appeal on 4 August 2011.' 'The...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment