O'Sullivan v P& O Maritime Service Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 508
There was no appealable final decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal; thus, no reason existed to extend time or grant leave to appeal from the primary judge's refusal. The application was dismissed with costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael O'Sullivan; Respondent: P&O Maritime Service Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time to Appeal, Leave to Appeal, Construction of Statute, Jurisdiction of Administrative Appeals Tribunal, Workers' Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael O'Sullivan
Applicant
P&O Maritime Service Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the primary judge erred in refusing an 'appeal' from a preliminary construction ruling of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- 2 Whether the application for extension of time and for leave to appeal should be granted under the circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
There was no appealable final decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal; thus, no reason existed to extend time or grant leave to appeal from the primary judge's refusal. The application was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
- The applicant pay the respondent's costs, to be assessed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment