Parnell v Cummins [2001] NSWSC 430

Parnell v Cummins [2001] NSWSC 430

The absence of any note or memorandum to satisfy s 54A of the Conveyancing Act 1919 and the lack of equitable circumstances negated the existence of a caveatable interest, warranting refusal to extend the caveat.

Parties
Plaintiff: Michael Parnell; Defendant: Mark John Cummins
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 May 2001
Procedural Posture
Summons for Extension of Caveat / Judgment at First Instance
Outcome
Application for extension of caveat dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Land Titles, Torrens System, Caveats Against Dealings, Form of Caveat, Oral Contract and Enforceability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Parnell

Plaintiff

Mark John Cummins

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summons for Extension of Caveat / Judgment at First Instance

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an extension of the caveat over land based on an oral agreement to grant a mortgage as security

Ratio Decidendi

The absence of any note or memorandum to satisfy s 54A of the Conveyancing Act 1919 and the lack of equitable circumstances negated the existence of a caveatable interest, warranting refusal to extend the caveat.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of caveat dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Summons dismissed.
  • Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs.