Quach v New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission; Quach v New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal [2018] NSWCA 175
Section 72 of the Commonwealth Constitution does not apply to the Supreme Court of New South Wales, which is a State court, not a court created by the Commonwealth Parliament. Therefore, the presence of a Judge of Appeal above age 70 did not invalidate the constitution of the Court or its orders under the Vexatious Proceedings Act. Mr Quach's applications must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Vexatious Proceedings Orders / Decision on Notices of Motion to Set Aside Vexatious Proceedings Order
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['vexatious Proceedings' 'validity of Judicial Appointments' 'jurisdiction of State Courts' 'section 72 Commonwealth Constitution']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Vexatious Proceedings Orders / Decision on Notices of Motion to Set Aside Vexatious Proceedings Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether court was validly constituted in light of s 72 of Constitution due to age of judge' 'Whether s 72 of Constitution applies to judges of State Supreme Courts' 'Whether leave under s 14 of Vexatious Proceedings Act is required for application under s 9']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 72 of the Commonwealth Constitution does not apply to the Supreme Court of New South Wales, which is a State court, not a court created by the Commonwealth Parliament. Therefore, the presence of a Judge of Appeal above age 70 did not invalidate the constitution of the Court or its orders under the Vexatious Proceedings Act. Mr Quach's applications must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed
Orders
- ['To the extent necessary, grant leave under s 14 of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) for the filing by the plaintiff of the notices of motion on 20 November 2017 in proceedings 2015/67618, 2015/48269 and 2015/158685.' 'Dismiss the notices of motion filed 20 November 2017 in proceedings 2015/67618,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment