Bass, Michael Reginald & Anor v Permanent Trustee Company Ltd & Ors [1996] FCA 1090
The State of New South Wales is not bound by the Trade Practices Act and claims under it are not maintainable against the State. Other respondents are immune from claims to the extent their acts were within the HomeFund scheme or at the State’s direction. The limitation on cost liability provided by Legal Aid Commission Act is invalid to the extent it conflicts with the Federal Court’s power to award costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Determination of Preliminary Questions and Orders
- Outcome
- Preliminary questions answered; partial striking out of claims; leave to amend claims granted
- Legal Topics
- ['state Immunity' 'trade Practices Act' 'fair Trading Act' 'legal Aid Commission Act' 'home Fund Scheme']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Determination of Preliminary Questions and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the State of New South Wales is bound by the Trade Practices Act' 'Immunity of respondents in relation to the HomeFund scheme' 'Maintainability of proceedings under the Trade Practices Act and Fair Trading Act' "Applicants' protection from costs under Legal Aid Commission Act"]
Ratio Decidendi
The State of New South Wales is not bound by the Trade Practices Act and claims under it are not maintainable against the State. Other respondents are immune from claims to the extent their acts were within the HomeFund scheme or at the State’s direction. The limitation on cost liability provided by Legal Aid Commission Act is invalid to the extent it conflicts with the Federal Court’s power to award costs.
Court Disposition
Preliminary questions answered; partial striking out of claims; leave to amend claims granted
Orders
- ['Claims under Parts IVA and V of the Trade Practices Act against the State of New South Wales struck out' 'Claims under Part IVA and V of the Trade Practices Act against first, second, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth respondents struck out, with leave to amend regarding matters outside HomeFund scheme'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment