Shirley v Waverley Council [2010] NSWLEC 1134
The appeal is dismissed because, although the development is not considered excessive in bulk or overdevelopment for the area and the proposal generally meets regulatory requirements, the only issue warranting refusal is the unacceptable amenity impact of the contrived relationship between the proposed upstairs play area for the child care centre and the existing residential units. This adverse impact renders the site unsuitable for the proposed development under s 79C(1)(c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment, Ex Tempore
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; development application refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'child Care Centres' 'open Space Requirements' 'amenity Impacts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment, Ex Tempore
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed increase in child care numbers and expansion of open space meets the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Waverley Local Environmental Plan' 'Whether the proposal would have unacceptable amenity impacts on the locality, including the adjoining residential dwellings' 'Whether the proposal constitutes an overdevelopment and fails to meet the zone objectives']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because, although the development is not considered excessive in bulk or overdevelopment for the area and the proposal generally meets regulatory requirements, the only issue warranting refusal is the unacceptable amenity impact of the contrived relationship between the proposed upstairs play area for the child care centre and the existing residential units. This adverse impact renders the site unsuitable for the proposed development under s 79C(1)(c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; development application refused.
Orders
- ['The appeal in respect of 28-30 Bourke Street, Queens Park is dismissed.' 'Development application submitted to Waverley Council and as amended is determined by refusal.' 'The exhibits are returned to the parties.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment