Stankovic v The Hills Shire Council [2012] FCA 521

Stankovic v The Hills Shire Council [2012] FCA 521

The circumstances outlined by the applicant, including release of funds and unavailability of his preferred solicitor, do not constitute grounds to vacate the hearing; application for adjournment is rejected.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 May 2012
Procedural Posture
Application to Extend Time for Filing Notice of Appeal From a Sequestration Order / Application for Adjournment of Hearing
Outcome
Application for adjournment refused
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'adjournment of Hearing']
['bankruptcy'] ['extension of Time' 'adjournment of Hearing']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application to Extend Time for Filing Notice of Appeal From a Sequestration Order / Application for Adjournment of Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether there is a basis for granting an adjournment of the hearing']

Ratio Decidendi

The circumstances outlined by the applicant, including release of funds and unavailability of his preferred solicitor, do not constitute grounds to vacate the hearing; application for adjournment is rejected.

Court Disposition

Application for adjournment refused

Orders

  • ["The applicant's application for an adjournment of today's hearing be refused."]