Stewart v Grauby [2012] FCA 703
The applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for delay and viable grounds for appeal; the possibility of future assets from a family law proceeding is not relevant to whether the sequestration order should have been made at the time. The application to extend time was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application to Extend Time to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal From Dismissal of Annulment Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'annulment of Bankruptcy' 'solvency Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application to Extend Time to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal From Dismissal of Annulment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Should time be extended to appeal from the Federal Magistrates Court order dismissing the application for annulment of bankruptcy?' 'Was the applicant solvent at the time the sequestration order was made?']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for delay and viable grounds for appeal; the possibility of future assets from a family law proceeding is not relevant to whether the sequestration order should have been made at the time. The application to extend time was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application filed on 4 June 2012 seeking an extension of time under r 36.05 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 to file a notice of appeal be dismissed.' 'The costs of the application are to be costs of the administration of the bankrupt estate.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment