Tuffy v Vaughan (No. 2) (Costs) (GD) [2010] NSWADTAP 25

Tuffy v Vaughan (No. 2) (Costs) (GD) [2010] NSWADTAP 25

The appeal lacked merit and could properly be regarded as vexatious. There was no statutory right to bring the appeal, and it unnecessarily prolonged the dispute. It is fair and reasonable for the appellant to pay the respondents’ costs as the application was not even arguable and incurred unnecessary expense.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 April 2010
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Application Following Dismissal of Appeal for Want of Jurisdiction
Outcome
Costs awarded against appellant
Legal Topics
['election Disputes' 'costs on Appeal' 'jurisdictional Issues']
['administrative Law' 'local Government Law'] ['election Disputes' 'costs on Appeal' 'jurisdictional Issues']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Costs Application Following Dismissal of Appeal for Want of Jurisdiction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether costs should be awarded to respondents following the dismissal of an appeal for want of jurisdiction']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal lacked merit and could properly be regarded as vexatious. There was no statutory right to bring the appeal, and it unnecessarily prolonged the dispute. It is fair and reasonable for the appellant to pay the respondents’ costs as the application was not even arguable and incurred unnecessary expense.

Court Disposition

Costs awarded against appellant

Orders

  • ["The Appellant pay the First and Second Respondents' costs of the appeal in the amount of $1,650 (being $1,500 plus GST)."]