Udy v Tilley [2018] NSWCATAP 89
The appellant's application was out of time under the RT Act/Regulation, and in any event was precluded by the full and final settlement reached in the landlord's compensation proceedings. There was no basis to interfere with the Tribunal's fact findings and no error in the refusal of leave to appeal.
- Parties
- Appellant: Michael Udy; Respondent: Monique Tilley
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Residential Tenancy, Compensation Claim, Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused, appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Water Usage Charges, Breach of Residential Tenancy Agreement, Time Limits for Applications, Settlement of Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Udy
Appellant
Monique Tilley
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Residential Tenancy, Compensation Claim, Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for compensation was out of time under s 190(1) RT Act and reg 22(9) RT Regulation
- 2 Whether the earlier settlement agreement precluded the present claim
- 3 Whether the Tribunal erred as to the nature of the claim (compensation vs refund)
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's application was out of time under the RT Act/Regulation, and in any event was precluded by the full and final settlement reached in the landlord's compensation proceedings. There was no basis to interfere with the Tribunal's fact findings and no error in the refusal of leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused, appeal dismissed
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is refused and the appeal is otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment