Williams v R [2016] NSWCCA 68
The sentencing judge did not err in assessment of objective seriousness, application of the totality principle, or consideration of aggravating factors. No House v R error or manifest excess was shown and differences with the co-offender's sentence were justified by distinctions in criminality. The appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'supply Commercial Quantity of Prohibited Drug' 'aggregate Sentence' 'assessment of Objective Seriousness' 'principle of Totality' 'parity' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in assessment of objective seriousness of offences' 'Whether the principle of totality was properly applied' 'Whether the judge gave undue weight to factors including protection of the community and custodial conduct' 'Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive' 'Whether there was a justifiable sense of grievance in parity toward a co-offender']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge did not err in assessment of objective seriousness, application of the totality principle, or consideration of aggravating factors. No House v R error or manifest excess was shown and differences with the co-offender's sentence were justified by distinctions in criminality. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal.' 'Dismiss the appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment