Amante v R [2020] NSWCCA 34
The sentencing judge's findings regarding the fire's structural risk and the applicant's untreated mental health and need for specific deterrence were open on the evidence and did not result in error; there was no denial of procedural fairness.
- Parties
- Applicant: Michale Amante; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Appeal Against Sentence, Role of Judicial Notice on Sentence, Specific and General Deterrence, Mental Health and Criminal Responsibility, Use of Photographic Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michale Amante
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentencing judge erred in taking judicial notice regarding the structural risk posed by fire to a building
- 2 Whether sentencing judge erred in treating the applicant's mental health as largely unresolved and untreated for the purpose of sentencing (specific deterrence)
- 3 Whether applicant was denied procedural fairness regarding findings on mental health
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge's findings regarding the fire's structural risk and the applicant's untreated mental health and need for specific deterrence were open on the evidence and did not result in error; there was no denial of procedural fairness.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence is granted.
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment