Santo v Childs Family Kindergarten Limited & Anor [2007] NSWLEC 117
The application was premature; there was insufficient reason to limit the costs assessor's discretion, and the statutory process should proceed before any Court intervention in assessment methodology.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application / Post Judgment Costs Hearing
- Outcome
- Costs ordered; application for limiting costs assessor's discretion refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Assessment' 'party/party Costs' 'discretion of Costs Assessor']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Costs Application / Post Judgment Costs Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the costs order should limit the costs assessor's discretion to award costs for undertaking a costs assessment"]
Ratio Decidendi
The application was premature; there was insufficient reason to limit the costs assessor's discretion, and the statutory process should proceed before any Court intervention in assessment methodology.
Court Disposition
Costs ordered; application for limiting costs assessor's discretion refused.
Orders
- ["The First Respondent pay the Applicants' reasonable costs of and incidental to the proceedings as agreed or assessed, except the costs of and incidental to the hearing on costs on 29 January 2007, in relation to which the Applicants shall pay the costs of the First Respondent as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment