Flynn & Anor v Aththas [2017] NSWLEC 1685
The applicants failed to provide sufficient evidence that the respondent's Viburnum trees were, at the time of hearing, severely obstructing sunlight to the relevant windows of their dwelling, as required under s 14E(2)(a)(i) of the Trees Act. Accordingly, the jurisdictional precondition to making an order was not satisfied.
- Parties
- Applicants: Michael & Carolyn Flynn; Respondent: Michelle Aththas
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Decision at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trees and Vegetation Disputes, Obstruction of Sunlight, Neighbour Disputes, Jurisdictional Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael & Carolyn Flynn
Applicants
Michelle Aththas
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Decision at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Viburnum trees maintained by the respondent are severely obstructing sunlight to windows of the applicants' dwelling under s 14E(2)(a)(i) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
- 2 Whether the jurisdictional preconditions to making an order under Part 2A of the Trees Act are satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants failed to provide sufficient evidence that the respondent's Viburnum trees were, at the time of hearing, severely obstructing sunlight to the relevant windows of their dwelling, as required under s 14E(2)(a)(i) of the Trees Act. Accordingly, the jurisdictional precondition to making an order was not satisfied.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment