Chapman v Cheng and Anor (RLD) [2003] NSWADTAP 23

Chapman v Cheng and Anor (RLD) [2003] NSWADTAP 23

The Appeal Panel held that s 16 of the Retail Leases Act 1994 did not prevent consensual termination of the lease before five years, as occurred by letters of 8 May 2002. The Respondents' conduct in seeking rent and rent increase did not breach the covenant of quiet enjoyment absent fraud or deceit. No damages for business loss or loss of reputation were available as causation and evidence of loss were not established. Refusal to admit further evidence did not affect the outcome, nor deny natural justice.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 July 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['retail Lease Termination' 'breach of Quiet Enjoyment' 'unlawful Re Entry and Damages' 'tribunal Procedure' 'extension of Lease Under Statute']
['administrative Law' 'property Law' 'commercial Law'] ['retail Lease Termination' 'breach of Quiet Enjoyment' 'unlawful Re Entry and Damages' 'tribunal Procedure' 'extension of Lease Under Statute']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Decision on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal erred in relation to the application of s 16 Retail Leases Act 1994 to the lease term' 'Whether refusal to admit further evidence was a denial of natural justice' 'Whether damages for business loss, loss of reputation, hurt feelings, severe depression and anxiety should have been awarded' "Whether the Respondents' conduct constituted a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment"]

Ratio Decidendi

The Appeal Panel held that s 16 of the Retail Leases Act 1994 did not prevent consensual termination of the lease before five years, as occurred by letters of 8 May 2002. The Respondents' conduct in seeking rent and rent increase did not breach the covenant of quiet enjoyment absent fraud or deceit. No damages for business loss or loss of reputation were available as causation and evidence of loss were not established. Refusal to admit further evidence did not affect the outcome, nor deny natural justice.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed']