Lazarus v Director of Public Prosecutions NSW [2016] NSWCA 47

Lazarus v Director of Public Prosecutions NSW [2016] NSWCA 47

Leave to appeal is refused as no error is identified in the primary judge's reasoning regarding the validity of prosecution commencement, and discretionary grounds support refusal given the existence and exercise of a District Court appeal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
['supervisory Jurisdiction' 'judicial Review' 'commencing Summary Prosecution' 'authority to Issue Court Attendance Notice']
['civil Procedure' 'criminal Procedure'] ['supervisory Jurisdiction' 'judicial Review' 'commencing Summary Prosecution' 'authority to Issue Court Attendance Notice']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted in the exercise of supervisory jurisdiction' 'Whether the prosecution was validly commenced by an officer of the Independent Commission Against Corruption' 'Whether fresh issues challenging the validity of the investigation can be raised for the first time on appeal']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal is refused as no error is identified in the primary judge's reasoning regarding the validity of prosecution commencement, and discretionary grounds support refusal given the existence and exercise of a District Court appeal.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • ['Refuse the application for leave to appeal.' "Applicant to pay the respondent's costs in this Court."]