R v ARDRON [2000] NSWCCA 412
The sentencing Judge acted within proper discretion, correctly identified and weighed aggravating and mitigating factors relevant to dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm under the influence of alcohol. Guideline judgments such as Jurisic provide guidance, not binding standards. The sentence of two years eight months imprisonment was well within the proper range, and leave to appeal should be granted but the appeal dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'dangerous Driving' 'aggravating Factors']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was excessive and wrong in principle' 'Whether aggravating factors were correctly identified and weighed' 'Proper application of guideline judgments such as Regina v Jurisic']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing Judge acted within proper discretion, correctly identified and weighed aggravating and mitigating factors relevant to dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm under the influence of alcohol. Guideline judgments such as Jurisic provide guidance, not binding standards. The sentence of two years eight months imprisonment was well within the proper range, and leave to appeal should be granted but the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment