R v Royal [2003] NSWCCA 260

R v Royal [2003] NSWCCA 260

No error was found in the sentencing judge's approach; the sentence and non-parole period appropriately reflected the applicant's criminality and circumstances; leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Michelle Royal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 September 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Sentence Appeal, Obtaining a Benefit by Deception, Excessive Sentence
Criminal Law Sentence Appeal Obtaining a Benefit by Deception Excessive Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Michelle Royal

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the non-parole period was appropriate given the applicant's role

Ratio Decidendi

No error was found in the sentencing judge's approach; the sentence and non-parole period appropriately reflected the applicant's criminality and circumstances; leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Appeal dismissed