Coe v Roth [2009] NSWSC 1386

On the evidence, there is no basis to conclude that the Supreme Court of Queensland is the proper forum or that the interests of justice require transfer, so the application to transfer is dismissed.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 25 September 2009
Procedural Posture: Civil / Application for Transfer of Proceedings
Outcome: Defendant's application for transfer dismissed with costs
Legal Topics: ['cross Vesting' 'interests of Justice' 'transfer of Proceedings']

['practice and Procedure'] ['cross Vesting' 'interests of Justice' 'transfer of Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application for Transfer of Proceedings

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the interests of justice require transfer of these proceedings to the Supreme Court of Queensland']

Ratio Decidendi

On the evidence, there is no basis to conclude that the Supreme Court of Queensland is the proper forum or that the interests of justice require transfer, so the application to transfer is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Defendant's application for transfer dismissed with costs

Orders

["The defendant's notice of motion filed on 12 August 2009 is dismissed with costs." 'Proceedings listed for directions in the Directions list on 2 October 2009.' 'The exhibit on the application be handed out.']