Pacific Rim Accommodation Group Pty Ltd v Mid-Coast Council [2018] NSWLEC 1578
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, with no identified jurisdictional impediment, the proceedings were disposed of by making orders giving effect to that agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Under S 8.18 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Concerning a Revised Development Control Order / Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; the Development Control Order dated 26 April 2018 is to be revoked upon surrender of Development Consent No. DA 198/2012, with restrictions on specified physical activity prior to surrender.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Control Order' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'surrender of Development Consent' 'earthworks, Excavation, Road Construction and Tree Removal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Under S 8.18 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Concerning a Revised Development Control Order / Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement reached under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979" 'Whether the agreed decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, with no identified jurisdictional impediment, the proceedings were disposed of by making orders giving effect to that agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; the Development Control Order dated 26 April 2018 is to be revoked upon surrender of Development Consent No. DA 198/2012, with restrictions on specified physical activity prior to surrender.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The Development Control Order dated 26 April 2018 issued by the Respondent is revoked upon the surrender of Development Consent No. DA 198/2012 in the form required by clause 97 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000.' 'Prior to the surrender of Development Consent No....
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment