Mid Coast Radio Pty ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal & Anor [1983] FCA 370
The Court declined to grant an immediate stay because the Tribunal hearing was virtually concluded, the Court is generally reluctant to interrupt pending tribunal proceedings under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act, and no substantial hardship would be suffered by the applicant if the hearing...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review Under the Administrative Decisions (judicial Review) Act / Motion for Stay of Tribunal Inquiry Proceedings
- Outcome
- Immediate stay refused; deferred stay granted upon conclusion of addresses before the Tribunal, with directions for pleadings, evidence, document exchange, mention, and final hearing.
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'stay of Tribunal Proceedings' 'balance of Convenience' 'administrative Decisions (judicial Review) Act']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review Under the Administrative Decisions (judicial Review) Act / Motion for Stay of Tribunal Inquiry Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should stay the hearing before the Australian Broadcasting Tribunal pending determination of the application for judicial review.' 'Whether a deferred stay after conclusion of addresses, rather than an immediate stay, would adequately protect the applicant pending judicial review.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court declined to grant an immediate stay because the Tribunal hearing was virtually concluded, the Court is generally reluctant to interrupt pending tribunal proceedings under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act, and no substantial hardship would be suffered by the applicant if the hearing concluded provided further proceedings after addresses were stayed pending the judicial review. A deferred stay after conclusion of addresses adequately protected the applicant while allowing the Tribunal hearing to reach that point.
Court Disposition
Immediate stay refused; deferred stay granted upon conclusion of addresses before the Tribunal, with directions for pleadings, evidence, document exchange, mention, and final hearing.
Orders
- ['Upon conclusion of the addresses by the parties before the consolidated inquiry described in the application filed herein on 14 December, 1983, all further proceedings in the said inquiry be stayed until further order of the Court.' 'The applicant file and serve a statement of its claim on or before 23 December,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment