Basi v Namitha Nakul Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] FCA 671

Basi v Namitha Nakul Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] FCA 671

Significant and deliberate contraventions of the Fair Work Act and Restaurant Industry Award by the respondents necessitated the imposition of substantial penalties to achieve specific and general deterrence. Compensation orders and quantum meruit payments were granted, and civil penalties were directed to be paid directly to the applicants in equal shares. Calculation of quantum meruit included a 25% casual loading. Additional compensation for loss of superannuation growth was refused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 June 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Enforcement Under Fair Work Act / Penalty Determination and Final Orders
Outcome
Application for civil penalties and compensation allowed.
Legal Topics
['fair Work Act Civil Penalty Provisions' 'restaurant Industry Award' 'underpayment of Wages' 'superannuation' 'annual Leave Entitlements' 'penalty Determination' 'quantum Meruit' 'deterrence' 'cashback Arrangements' 'visa Sponsorship Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil Enforcement Under Fair Work Act / Penalty Determination and Final Orders

  1. 1 ['Amount and payment of civil penalties for contraventions of Fair Work Act' 'To whom should penalties be paid' 'Entitlement to compensation for loss of growth in superannuation funds' 'Quantum meruit basis for unpaid work' 'Appropriate penalty structure under s 557A for serious contraventions']

Ratio Decidendi

Significant and deliberate contraventions of the Fair Work Act and Restaurant Industry Award by the respondents necessitated the imposition of substantial penalties to achieve specific and general deterrence. Compensation orders and quantum meruit payments were granted, and civil penalties were directed to be paid directly to the applicants in equal shares. Calculation of quantum meruit included a 25% casual loading. Additional compensation for loss of superannuation growth was refused.

Court Disposition

Application for civil penalties and compensation allowed.

Orders

  • ['First respondent (Namitha Nakul Pty Ltd) to pay aggregate civil penalty of $150,000, payable in equal amounts to each applicant.' 'Second respondent (Vaisakh Mohanan Usha) to pay aggregate civil penalty of $50,000, payable in equal amounts to each applicant.' 'Respondents to pay $90,963.59 to Midhun Basi by way of...