Basi v Namitha Nakul Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] FCA 671
Significant and deliberate contraventions of the Fair Work Act and Restaurant Industry Award by the respondents necessitated the imposition of substantial penalties to achieve specific and general deterrence. Compensation orders and quantum meruit payments were granted, and civil penalties were directed to be paid directly to the applicants in equal shares. Calculation of quantum meruit included a 25% casual loading. Additional compensation for loss of superannuation growth was refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Enforcement Under Fair Work Act / Penalty Determination and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Application for civil penalties and compensation allowed.
- Legal Topics
- ['fair Work Act Civil Penalty Provisions' 'restaurant Industry Award' 'underpayment of Wages' 'superannuation' 'annual Leave Entitlements' 'penalty Determination' 'quantum Meruit' 'deterrence' 'cashback Arrangements' 'visa Sponsorship Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Enforcement Under Fair Work Act / Penalty Determination and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Amount and payment of civil penalties for contraventions of Fair Work Act' 'To whom should penalties be paid' 'Entitlement to compensation for loss of growth in superannuation funds' 'Quantum meruit basis for unpaid work' 'Appropriate penalty structure under s 557A for serious contraventions']
Ratio Decidendi
Significant and deliberate contraventions of the Fair Work Act and Restaurant Industry Award by the respondents necessitated the imposition of substantial penalties to achieve specific and general deterrence. Compensation orders and quantum meruit payments were granted, and civil penalties were directed to be paid directly to the applicants in equal shares. Calculation of quantum meruit included a 25% casual loading. Additional compensation for loss of superannuation growth was refused.
Court Disposition
Application for civil penalties and compensation allowed.
Orders
- ['First respondent (Namitha Nakul Pty Ltd) to pay aggregate civil penalty of $150,000, payable in equal amounts to each applicant.' 'Second respondent (Vaisakh Mohanan Usha) to pay aggregate civil penalty of $50,000, payable in equal amounts to each applicant.' 'Respondents to pay $90,963.59 to Midhun Basi by way of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment