Barrie Goldsmith v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2001] FCA 407
On its ordinary language, item 1 of Schedule 1 could not be construed as permitting completion of continuing professional development activities outside the year ending on the anniversary of the previous registration. However, s 290A was directed to whether, at the time of deciding the re-registration application, the applicant had met the prescribed requirements, and did not itself impose a requirement that the activities be completed during the previous registration year. To the extent item 1 imposed that additional timing requirement it exceeded the statutory scheme, but s 46(1)(b) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 required it to be read down as requiring completion before the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the General Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Under S 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 Concerning Registration as a Migration Agent / Final Judgment; Decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Set Aside
- Outcome
- Application allowed; decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal set aside; respondent's refusal set aside; respondent ordered to register the applicant with effect from 28 November 2000; respondent to pay costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['migration Agents Registration' 'continuing Professional Development Requirements' 'validity and Construction of Regulations' 'statutory Interpretation' 'appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the General Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Under S 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 Concerning Registration as a Migration Agent / Final Judgment; Decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Set Aside
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether item 1 of Schedule 1 to the Migration Agents Regulations 1998 required continuing professional development activities to be completed during the year ending on the anniversary of the previous registration or merely before the application for re-registration.' 'Whether item 1 of Schedule 1 to the Migration Agents Regulations 1998 was invalid to the extent it required continuing professional development activities to be completed during the currency of the previous registration rather than before re-application.' 'Whether s 46(1)(b) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 required item 1 of Schedule 1 to be read down so as not to exceed the regulation-making power.']
Ratio Decidendi
On its ordinary language, item 1 of Schedule 1 could not be construed as permitting completion of continuing professional development activities outside the year ending on the anniversary of the previous registration. However, s 290A was directed to whether, at the time of deciding the re-registration application, the applicant had met the prescribed requirements, and did not itself impose a requirement that the activities be completed during the previous registration year. To the extent item 1 imposed that additional timing requirement it exceeded the statutory scheme, but s 46(1)(b) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 required it to be read down as requiring completion before the...
Court Disposition
Application allowed; decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal set aside; respondent's refusal set aside; respondent ordered to register the applicant with effect from 28 November 2000; respondent to pay costs.
Orders
- ['The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal made on 6 March 2001 be set aside.' "In lieu of this decision, it be ordered that the respondent's decision of 28 November 2000 refusing the applicant's application for registration as a migration agent be set aside." "The respondent enter the applicant's name...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment