Salveron v Trustees of the De La Salle Brothers t/as De La Salle College, Revesby [2018] NSWSC 1537
Having carefully read the referee's report, and having regard to its nature and contents, the reasons justifying the conclusions reached, and the absence of any objection, it was appropriate to adopt the report in whole, consistently with the overriding purpose in s 56 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Procedure Ruling in Personal Injury Damages Proceedings / Plaintiff's Oral Motion for Adoption of Referee Report Under R 20.24 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
- Outcome
- Referee report adopted in whole; judgment ordered in favour of the plaintiff against the second and third defendants; costs ordered against the first, second and third defendants; plaintiff ordered to discontinue against the first defendant after payment; matter finalised.
- Legal Topics
- ['referral to Referee' 'adoption of Referee Report' 'costs' 'discontinuance' 'assessment of Damages Under the Civil Liability Act 2002']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure Ruling in Personal Injury Damages Proceedings / Plaintiff's Oral Motion for Adoption of Referee Report Under R 20.24 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court should adopt in whole the referee's report on the appropriate amount to be awarded to the plaintiff for personal injury damages."]
Ratio Decidendi
Having carefully read the referee's report, and having regard to its nature and contents, the reasons justifying the conclusions reached, and the absence of any objection, it was appropriate to adopt the report in whole, consistently with the overriding purpose in s 56 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005.
Court Disposition
Referee report adopted in whole; judgment ordered in favour of the plaintiff against the second and third defendants; costs ordered against the first, second and third defendants; plaintiff ordered to discontinue against the first defendant after payment; matter finalised.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to r 20.24(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, the Court adopts the report of Ms Margaret Sidis dated 6 September 2016, in whole.' 'Order that there be judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the second and third defendants in the sum set out in Order 2 of the Short Minutes of Order...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment