Milan Nenadic v Zvonko Nenadic [2014] NSWSC 1229

Milan Nenadic v Zvonko Nenadic [2014] NSWSC 1229

Because the earlier specific performance order placed the contract under the Court's control, Zvonko's purported termination was ineffective; the erroneous 2013 contract date in the declaration was a mere slip to be corrected to 2012; the later increase in property value was irrelevant to whether specific performance should proceed; and Milan could obtain an extension of time only on terms that he pay interest on unpaid purchase money. Compensation for exclusive occupation was refused because it had not been sought in the initiating process, cross-claim, or trial and was not within the supplementary relief available after judgment.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 September 2014
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceeding Concerning Specific Performance of a Contract for Sale of Land / Notices of Motion After Judgment and Order for Specific Performance
Outcome
Milan's motion to extend time for completion was granted on terms; the declaration was amended under the slip rule; Zvonko's termination position and compensation claim were rejected; each party was ordered to pay his own costs of the motions.
Legal Topics
['specific Performance' 'supplementary Relief After Judgment' 'slip Rule Amendment' 'notices to Complete and Terminate' 'interest on Unpaid Purchase Money' 'compensation for Occupation' 'section 66 G Sale Proceedings']
['equity' 'property Law' 'contract Law'] ['specific Performance' 'supplementary Relief After Judgment' 'slip Rule Amendment' 'notices to Complete and Terminate' 'interest on Unpaid Purchase Money' 'compensation for Occupation' 'section 66 G Sale Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Proceeding Concerning Specific Performance of a Contract for Sale of Land / Notices of Motion After Judgment and Order for Specific Performance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Court could grant further and supplementary relief after an order for specific performance had been made.' "Whether Zvonko's purported termination after the specific performance order was effective or could be validated nunc pro tunc." 'Whether the declaration should be amended because it referred to the contract date as 15 October 2013 instead of 15 October 2012.' 'Whether the increase in value of the property since the contract justified refusing performance or ordering compensation.' 'Whether Milan should pay interest on unpaid purchase money while in possession.' "Whether Zvonko could obtain compensation for Milan's exclusive occupation of the property."]

Ratio Decidendi

Because the earlier specific performance order placed the contract under the Court's control, Zvonko's purported termination was ineffective; the erroneous 2013 contract date in the declaration was a mere slip to be corrected to 2012; the later increase in property value was irrelevant to whether specific performance should proceed; and Milan could obtain an extension of time only on terms that he pay interest on unpaid purchase money. Compensation for exclusive occupation was refused because it had not been sought in the initiating process, cross-claim, or trial and was not within the supplementary relief available after judgment.

Court Disposition

Milan's motion to extend time for completion was granted on terms; the declaration was amended under the slip rule; Zvonko's termination position and compensation claim were rejected; each party was ordered to pay his own costs of the motions.

Orders

  • ['Order that Declaration 1 made 12 March, 2014 be amended by substituting "15 October 2012" for "15 October 2013".' 'Order that the time for completion of the relevant contract be extended to 6:00pm on 5 September, 2014.' 'Order that on completion the plaintiff also pay the defendant interest of $8,993.' 'Each part...