Visnic v Sywak & Ors [2007] NSWSC 701
On the balance of probabilities, the arrangement between the plaintiff and first defendant following the 1996 acquisition of former business associates' shares was that each was beneficially entitled to half the shares in Adellos Pty Limited and Parlamartu Pty Limited, despite registration in the first defendant's name. There was no agreement or valid transfer in 1999 for the plaintiff to relinquish his beneficial interest in any of the four companies. The rectification of share registers is warranted, and equal shareholdings have resulted in deadlock, justifying winding up the defendant companies on the just and equitable ground.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Milan Visnic; First Defendant: Peter Orest Sywak; Second Defendant: Adellos Pty Limited; Third Defendant: Parlamartu Pty Limited; Fourth Defendant: Castlove Pty Limited; Fifth Defendant: Donovi Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings / Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders for declarations, rectification of share registers, transfer of shares, appointment of liquidator and winding up, costs to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Beneficial Ownership of Shares, Trusts in Corporate Context, Rectification of Share Registers, Deadlock and Winding Up on Just and Equitable Ground
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Milan Visnic
Plaintiff
Peter Orest Sywak
First Defendant
Adellos Pty Limited
Second Defendant
Parlamartu Pty Limited
Third Defendant
Castlove Pty Limited
Fourth Defendant
Donovi Pty Limited
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the shares in Adellos Pty Limited, Parlamartu Pty Limited, Castlove Pty Limited and Donovi Pty Limited legally held by Mr Sywak were beneficially held in equal shares for the plaintiff and defendant.
- 2 Whether there was an agreement in 1999 for the transfer of the plaintiff's remaining shares to the first defendant.
- 3 Whether the share registers should be rectified under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 175.
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, the arrangement between the plaintiff and first defendant following the 1996 acquisition of former business associates' shares was that each was beneficially entitled to half the shares in Adellos Pty Limited and Parlamartu Pty Limited, despite registration in the first defendant's name. There was no agreement or valid transfer in 1999 for the plaintiff to relinquish his beneficial interest in any of the four companies. The rectification of share registers is warranted, and equal shareholdings have resulted in deadlock, justifying winding up the defendant companies on the just and equitable ground.
Court Disposition
Orders for declarations, rectification of share registers, transfer of shares, appointment of liquidator and winding up, costs to plaintiff.
Orders
- Declare plaintiff entitled at law and in equity to (i) one of two issued shares in Castlove, (ii) nine of eighteen issued shares in Donovi, (iii) two of eight issued shares in each of Adellos and Parlamartu.
- Declare plaintiff beneficially entitled to two further shares in each of Adellos and Parlamartu held legally by first defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment