Visnic v Sywak & ors [2008] NSWSC 427
No damage attributable to breach of fiduciary duty owed to plaintiff was established which has not been remedied by declaration of trust and transfer orders already made. Any liability to account for breaches owed to the company is owed to the company, not to the plaintiff, and must be pursued by the liquidator or by derivative action. Plaintiff's motion for inquiry is dismissed.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Milan Visnic; First Defendant: Peter Orest Sywak; Second Defendant: Adellos Pty Limited; Third Defendant: Parlamartu Pty Limited; Fourth Defendant: Castlove Pty Limited; Fifth Defendant: Donovi Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Equity / Motion for Inquiry as to Damages; Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed 4 October 2007 dismissed with costs; defendant's motion also effectively disposed of.
- Legal Topics
- Equitable Compensation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Causation, Account of Profits, Corporate Fiduciary Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Milan Visnic
Plaintiff
Peter Orest Sywak
First Defendant
Adellos Pty Limited
Second Defendant
Parlamartu Pty Limited
Third Defendant
Castlove Pty Limited
Fourth Defendant
Donovi Pty Limited
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity / Motion for Inquiry as to Damages; Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff suffered damage or loss from breach of fiduciary duty not remedied by prior orders
- 2 Whether defendant owes liability to account to plaintiff (shareholder) for breaches of duty owed to company
Ratio Decidendi
No damage attributable to breach of fiduciary duty owed to plaintiff was established which has not been remedied by declaration of trust and transfer orders already made. Any liability to account for breaches owed to the company is owed to the company, not to the plaintiff, and must be pursued by the liquidator or by derivative action. Plaintiff's motion for inquiry is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed 4 October 2007 dismissed with costs; defendant's motion also effectively disposed of.
Orders
- Plaintiff's motion filed 4 October 2007 dismissed, with costs
- Order disposes of both motions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment