Milanka Zugic v Jeremy Clarke [2014] NSWSC 1231
Because there was an arguable case for the existence of a joint venture, money had been paid from the first plaintiff's accounts into or on behalf of a business conducted by the defendants, and the balance of convenience favoured allowing supply contracts to be fulfilled without prejudicing either side, the Court made mutual interlocutory restraint and accounting orders until further order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Applications / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Interlocutory orders made until further order; costs to be costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- ['joint Venture' 'interlocutory Injunction' 'account of Profits' 'part Performance' 'balance of Convenience']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Applications / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was an arguable case for the existence of a joint venture agreement between the parties.' "Whether interlocutory orders should be made to allow contracts for the supply of pre-cast concrete panels to be fulfilled while preserving the parties' positions." 'Whether the parties should account for property and profits relating to the pre-cast concrete business from 14 March 2014.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because there was an arguable case for the existence of a joint venture, money had been paid from the first plaintiff's accounts into or on behalf of a business conducted by the defendants, and the balance of convenience favoured allowing supply contracts to be fulfilled without prejudicing either side, the Court made mutual interlocutory restraint and accounting orders until further order.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory orders made until further order; costs to be costs in the cause.
Orders
- ['The defendants, and each of them, any related company, their servants or agents, be restrained from conducting a business for the supply of pre-cast concrete panels other than as part of a joint venture with one or more of the plaintiffs;' 'The plaintiffs, and each of them, any related company, their servants or...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment