Millers Point Fund Incorporated v Lendlease (Millers Point) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 29
The proceedings were brought in the public interest, raised novel issues of law, affected a broad section of the community, involved significant environmental matters, and there were no countervailing circumstances warranting departure from the public interest costs rule. Pursuant to r 4.2(1) of the Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 (NSW), each party should bear its own costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Costs Application / Post Judgment, Notice of Motion for Alternative Costs Order
- Outcome
- Applicant’s Notice of Motion granted; each party to pay its own costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['public Interest Litigation' 'costs Orders' 'statutory Interpretation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Costs Application / Post Judgment, Notice of Motion for Alternative Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proceedings were brought in the public interest for purposes of costs order' 'Whether departure from usual costs rule is justified under r 4.2(1) Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings were brought in the public interest, raised novel issues of law, affected a broad section of the community, involved significant environmental matters, and there were no countervailing circumstances warranting departure from the public interest costs rule. Pursuant to r 4.2(1) of the Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 (NSW), each party should bear its own costs.
Court Disposition
Applicant’s Notice of Motion granted; each party to pay its own costs.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to r 4.2(1) of the Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 (NSW), each party is to pay its own costs of the Proceedings.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment