Mills Oakley (Partnership) v Asset HQ Australia Pty Ltd [2019] NSWDC 122
Default judgment was obtained against good faith given false communication regarding entry of judgment and defendant's inability to file a defence. The defendant demonstrated a bona fide defence and delay was explained by ongoing proceedings and lack of awareness. Interests of justice required the judgment be set aside.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment set aside; defendant directed to file defence within 14 days; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['default Judgment' 'setting Aside Judgment' 'good Faith' 'delay' 'bona Fide Defence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether default judgment obtained against good faith ought to be set aside under UCPR 36.15' 'Whether sufficient cause is shown to justify setting aside the judgment' 'Whether the defendant has a bona fide defence' 'Effect of delay in seeking to set aside judgment']
Ratio Decidendi
Default judgment was obtained against good faith given false communication regarding entry of judgment and defendant's inability to file a defence. The defendant demonstrated a bona fide defence and delay was explained by ongoing proceedings and lack of awareness. Interests of justice required the judgment be set aside.
Court Disposition
Judgment set aside; defendant directed to file defence within 14 days; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Judgment in favour of plaintiff entered 3 October 2017 is set aside.' 'Defendant directed to file a Defence within fourteen days.' 'Court will hear the parties as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment