Stankovic v Stankovic [2007] NSWSC 814
The matter was not ready for hearing because necessary subpoena steps had not been completed, the plaintiff was unrepresented and had given an explanation of ill health, and fairness required that he receive some indulgence given the first defendant had already received considerable indulgences in filing his affidavit of accounts; the hearing date was therefore vacated and further directions made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings for Taking of Accounts / Pre Hearing Directions; Adjournment and Vacation of Hearing Date
- Outcome
- Hearing date vacated
- Legal Topics
- ['adjournment' 'taking of Accounts' 'unrepresented Litigants' 'subpoenas' 'pre Trial Directions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings for Taking of Accounts / Pre Hearing Directions; Adjournment and Vacation of Hearing Date
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the hearing date should be vacated and further directions made because the plaintiff, who was unrepresented and relied on ill health, had not issued subpoenas said to be necessary.' 'Whether fairness required the plaintiff to be afforded indulgences where the first defendant had previously been granted considerable indulgences in filing his affidavit of accounts.']
Ratio Decidendi
The matter was not ready for hearing because necessary subpoena steps had not been completed, the plaintiff was unrepresented and had given an explanation of ill health, and fairness required that he receive some indulgence given the first defendant had already received considerable indulgences in filing his affidavit of accounts; the hearing date was therefore vacated and further directions made.
Court Disposition
Hearing date vacated
Orders
- ['Vacate the appointment for hearing appointed to commence before Brereton J on 12 July 2007 for two days.' 'Appoint Wednesday 1 August 2007 at 9am before the Registrar for return of subpoenas.' 'Direct that the plaintiff and the first defendant may, on or before 15 August 2007, examine the other party upon...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment