Stankovic v Namul Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 41
The notice of motion was dismissed because the appellant did not demonstrate an arguable basis that Rein J erred, did not lead clear evidence that the respondent knew of any allegedly defective title at the relevant time, advanced no basis for overturning Rein J's credit finding concerning Mr Newham, and no discretionary considerations favoured interlocutory relief.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Notice of Motion for Stay, Injunctive Relief and Return of Belongings
- Outcome
- The appellant's Notice of Motion is dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Relief' 'stay of Orders' 'torrens Title' 'fraud' 'sequestration Order' 'registered Proprietor']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Notice of Motion for Stay, Injunctive Relief and Return of Belongings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether orders made by Rein J on 14 February 2013 should be stayed pending appeal.' 'Whether the appellant had shown sufficient prospects of success to warrant interlocutory relief.' "Whether there was an arguable basis that the respondent's registered title was defeasible because of fraud or knowledge of defective title."]
Ratio Decidendi
The notice of motion was dismissed because the appellant did not demonstrate an arguable basis that Rein J erred, did not lead clear evidence that the respondent knew of any allegedly defective title at the relevant time, advanced no basis for overturning Rein J's credit finding concerning Mr Newham, and no discretionary considerations favoured interlocutory relief.
Court Disposition
The appellant's Notice of Motion is dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ["The appellant's Notice of Motion is dismissed with costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment