Regina v BOA MORTE [2003] NSWCCA 75
Although the trial judge erred in separately indicating a sentence for the Form 1 offence, the appeal was dismissed because no other sentence was warranted in law and the overall sentence imposed was within the proper range, applying the relevant sentencing principles and guidelines.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Milton Pinto Costa Boa Morte
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence; Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Appeal, Robbery in Company, Form 1 Offence, Application of Henry Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Milton Pinto Costa Boa Morte
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence; Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred by imposing a separate sentence for the offence listed on Form 1.
- 2 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive.
- 3 Whether the trial judge failed to properly assess the objective and subjective circumstances of the offender and applied the Henry guidelines appropriately.
Ratio Decidendi
Although the trial judge erred in separately indicating a sentence for the Form 1 offence, the appeal was dismissed because no other sentence was warranted in law and the overall sentence imposed was within the proper range, applying the relevant sentencing principles and guidelines.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment