Abdelmalak v R [2022] NSWDC 569
The aggregate sentence imposed by the Magistrate was excessive as the indicative sentences for the offences should be reduced. The head sentence and non-parole period should be proportionally decreased reflecting the reduction in the overall indicative sentences.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
- Outcome
- Sentence severity appeal allowed; aggregate sentence reassessed and reduced.
- Legal Topics
- ['severity of Sentence' 'appeal' 'aggregate Sentencing' 'driving Under the Influence' 'common Assault' 'stalking or Intimidation' 'contravention of Apprehended Domestic Violence Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed by the Magistrate was manifestly excessive' 'Appropriate indicative sentences for each offence' 'Aggregate sentencing approach']
Ratio Decidendi
The aggregate sentence imposed by the Magistrate was excessive as the indicative sentences for the offences should be reduced. The head sentence and non-parole period should be proportionally decreased reflecting the reduction in the overall indicative sentences.
Court Disposition
Sentence severity appeal allowed; aggregate sentence reassessed and reduced.
Orders
- ['Aggregate sentence imposed as follows: non-parole period of seven months commencing on 27 March 2022 and expiring on 26 October 2022; further imprisonment of five months commencing after expiry of the non-parole period and expiring on 26 March 2023; total sentence of one year.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment