Mine Subsidence Board v Jemena Ltd and Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd [2013] NSWCA 465
Section 15(5)(b) does not preclude the making or payment of claims under s 12A(1)(b). A claim under s 12A(1)(b) is for an amount to meet proper and necessary expense incurred or proposed for preventative or mitigatory work; subsidence damage is relevant only as anticipated damage that the work seeks to prevent or mitigate. The subject matter and justification of the claim and payment are the expense and work, not damage caused by subsidence or its detrimental consequences. Because the Act materially distinguishes claims in respect of actual damage from claims in respect of expense, and because any denial of the s 12A(1)(b) right would require clear language, the natural construction of s...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal From Jemena Ltd V Mine Subsidence Board [2012] NSWSC 1509
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['mine Subsidence Compensation Act 1961' 'mine Subsidence Districts' 'claims From Mine Subsidence Compensation Fund' 'preventative or Mitigatory Works' 'unapproved Improvements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal From Jemena Ltd V Mine Subsidence Board [2012] NSWSC 1509
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s 15(5)(b) of the Mine Subsidence Compensation Act 1961 prevents the Board from entertaining and paying claims under s 12A(1)(b) for proper and necessary expense incurred or proposed in preventing or mitigating subsidence caused damage to a pipeline erected in a mine subsidence district without approval and without a certificate under s 15B(3A).' 'Whether a claim under s 12A(1)(b) is a claim or payment "in respect of damage caused by subsidence" within s 15(5)(b).']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 15(5)(b) does not preclude the making or payment of claims under s 12A(1)(b). A claim under s 12A(1)(b) is for an amount to meet proper and necessary expense incurred or proposed for preventative or mitigatory work; subsidence damage is relevant only as anticipated damage that the work seeks to prevent or mitigate. The subject matter and justification of the claim and payment are the expense and work, not damage caused by subsidence or its detrimental consequences. Because the Act materially distinguishes claims in respect of actual damage from claims in respect of expense, and because any denial of the s 12A(1)(b) right would require clear language, the natural construction of s...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment