Minebiz Pty Ltd v Codey [2015] FCA 372
The evidence did not sustain a conclusion that Mr Codey was employed as an 'Underground Mine Employee' or that he was wrongly classified or underpaid under the Minebiz Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2010; therefore, the orders of the Local Court were set aside and his application was dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Minebiz Pty Ltd; Respondent: Scott Codey
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Local Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Enterprise Agreements, Underpayment of Wages, Employee Classification, Civil Penalty Provisions, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Minebiz Pty Ltd
Appellant
Scott Codey
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Local Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Codey was correctly classified under the enterprise agreement as a 'Surface Operator' or 'Underground Mine Employee'
- 2 Whether the classification structure in the enterprise agreement was referrable to classifications set out in the Mining Industry Award 2010
- 3 Whether the respondent discharged the onus of proof to show relevant employment designation
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not sustain a conclusion that Mr Codey was employed as an 'Underground Mine Employee' or that he was wrongly classified or underpaid under the Minebiz Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2010; therefore, the orders of the Local Court were set aside and his application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; application dismissed
Orders
- The appeal be allowed.
- The orders of the Local Court of New South Wales made on 12 August 2014 be set aside and, in their place, it be ordered that the application to that Court be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment