Minebiz Pty Ltd v Codey [2015] FCA 372

Minebiz Pty Ltd v Codey [2015] FCA 372

The evidence did not sustain a conclusion that Mr Codey was employed as an 'Underground Mine Employee' or that he was wrongly classified or underpaid under the Minebiz Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2010; therefore, the orders of the Local Court were set aside and his application was dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Minebiz Pty Ltd; Respondent: Scott Codey
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 April 2015
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Local Court of New South Wales
Outcome
Appeal allowed; application dismissed
Legal Topics
Enterprise Agreements, Underpayment of Wages, Employee Classification, Civil Penalty Provisions, Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Minebiz Pty Ltd

Appellant

Scott Codey

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Local Court of New South Wales

  1. 1 Whether Mr Codey was correctly classified under the enterprise agreement as a 'Surface Operator' or 'Underground Mine Employee'
  2. 2 Whether the classification structure in the enterprise agreement was referrable to classifications set out in the Mining Industry Award 2010
  3. 3 Whether the respondent discharged the onus of proof to show relevant employment designation

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence did not sustain a conclusion that Mr Codey was employed as an 'Underground Mine Employee' or that he was wrongly classified or underpaid under the Minebiz Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2010; therefore, the orders of the Local Court were set aside and his application was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; application dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal be allowed.
  • The orders of the Local Court of New South Wales made on 12 August 2014 be set aside and, in their place, it be ordered that the application to that Court be dismissed.