UI & UJ v Minister for Community Services [2006] NSWADT 16
The correct and preferable decision, having paramount regard to the safety, welfare and well-being of the children, and applying the Aboriginal Child Placement Principle as set out in the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998, is to affirm the decision to remove the children from the Applicants’ care. Despite the quality of care and secure attachments in the Applicants’ home, the long-term interests of the children, including cultural identity and connectedness to the Aboriginal community, are best served by their placement with approved Aboriginal carers. The evidence established a real risk of identity issues and placement breakdown should the children remain with...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Law – Child Protection Review / Review of Administrative Decision by Tribunal
- Outcome
- The decision to remove the subject children is affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['aboriginal Child Placement Principle' 'children in Out of Home Care' 'review of Removal From Foster Care' 'cultural Identity and Child Welfare']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law – Child Protection Review / Review of Administrative Decision by Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the decision to remove Aboriginal children from non-Aboriginal carers and place them with Aboriginal carers is the correct and preferable decision under the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 and Aboriginal Child Placement Principle' 'Whether the placement is in the best interests and welfare of the children']
Ratio Decidendi
The correct and preferable decision, having paramount regard to the safety, welfare and well-being of the children, and applying the Aboriginal Child Placement Principle as set out in the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998, is to affirm the decision to remove the children from the Applicants’ care. Despite the quality of care and secure attachments in the Applicants’ home, the long-term interests of the children, including cultural identity and connectedness to the Aboriginal community, are best served by their placement with approved Aboriginal carers. The evidence established a real risk of identity issues and placement breakdown should the children remain with...
Court Disposition
The decision to remove the subject children is affirmed.
Orders
- ['The decision to remove the children is affirmed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment