Minister for Education and Training v Tanner [2003] NSWCA 164
The loss of a right of access to a public road owned by an adjoining landowner, extinguished by compulsory acquisition of the road, constitutes an 'interest' in land under the Just Terms Act, making the owner entitled to compensation.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['resumption or Acquisition of Land' 'compensation' 'assessment' 'highways' 'rights of Access to Highway']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether compensation is payable for loss of right of access to a public road, where the road is acquired but not the adjoining owner's land"]
Ratio Decidendi
The loss of a right of access to a public road owned by an adjoining landowner, extinguished by compulsory acquisition of the road, constitutes an 'interest' in land under the Just Terms Act, making the owner entitled to compensation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment