Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DZU16 (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 48
The Minister's limited success on the relocation issue warranted apportionment, but the dominant Migration Act issues justified awarding 85% of DZU16's costs on appeal and at first instance.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Costs Decision Following Appeal Dismissal
- Outcome
- Appellant to pay 85% of First Respondent's costs both on appeal and at first instance; prior costs order varied.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'migration Act' 'mixed Success' 'apportionment of Costs']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Decision Following Appeal Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate apportionment of costs where appeal dismissed but appellant succeeded on one ground' 'Effect of mixed success on costs orders' 'Whether notice of contention affects costs apportionment']
Ratio Decidendi
The Minister's limited success on the relocation issue warranted apportionment, but the dominant Migration Act issues justified awarding 85% of DZU16's costs on appeal and at first instance.
Court Disposition
Appellant to pay 85% of First Respondent's costs both on appeal and at first instance; prior costs order varied.
Orders
- ['The appellant pay 85% of the costs of the first respondent, as agreed or assessed.' "Order 3 of the orders made by the primary judge on 22 June 2017 set aside and replaced with order that the first respondent pay 85% of the applicant's costs of those proceedings, as agreed or assessed and if necessary taxed in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment