Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Angkawijaya [2016] FCAFC 5
The Tribunal erred by proceeding on the basis that a lack of romantic love and affection was necessarily fatal to the existence of a genuine de facto relationship for the purposes of s 5CB of the Migration Act and reg 1.09A. This misapplied the legislative requirements, which do not mandate love or affection as...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['partner Visa' 'de Facto Relationship' 'judicial Review' 'tribunal Error']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether absence of love and affection necessarily means there is not a genuine de facto relationship under s 5CB of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) and reg 1.09A of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)' 'Whether the Tribunal misconstrued or misapplied legislative provisions by requiring romantic love as a criterion for a de facto relationship' 'Whether the Tribunal committed jurisdictional error by imposing a value judgment based on romantic love']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred by proceeding on the basis that a lack of romantic love and affection was necessarily fatal to the existence of a genuine de facto relationship for the purposes of s 5CB of the Migration Act and reg 1.09A. This misapplied the legislative requirements, which do not mandate love or affection as determinative and require consideration of all the circumstances. The primary judge correctly found jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ["The name of the third respondent be amended to read 'Administrative Appeals Tribunal'." 'The appeal be dismissed.' 'The notice of contention be dismissed.' 'The appellant pay the costs of the first and second respondents as agreed or assessed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment