Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CED16Citation:[2020] HCA 24Before:Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon, Edelman JJDate:30 Jun 2020Case Number:S347/2019Read more
The certificate under s 473GB was invalid and not before the delegate at the time of the decision under review; therefore, it constituted 'new information' within the meaning of s 473DC(1) and should have been considered as such by the Authority.
- Parties
- Applicant: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Respondent: First Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Protection Visa, Judicial Review, Procedural Fairness, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
Applicant
First Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the certificate under s 473GB of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was 'new information' within the meaning of s 473DC(1)
- 2 Whether the certificate was a 'document' or contained 'information' relevant to the review
- 3 Whether the Authority could infer the certificate may have been relevant to the conduct of the review
Ratio Decidendi
The certificate under s 473GB was invalid and not before the delegate at the time of the decision under review; therefore, it constituted 'new information' within the meaning of s 473DC(1) and should have been considered as such by the Authority.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The decision of the lower court is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment