NBMO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 465

NBMO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 465

The clarity and width of s 48A, expressly subject to s 48B, did not permit the narrowed construction advanced by the fifth applicant; any new or changed claims were matters for s 48B. Because there was no legitimate prima facie issue that s 48A should be read down, the fifth applicant was not entitled to interlocutory relief restraining removal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Application for Declarations as to the Proper Construction of S 48 a of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) and to Restrain Removal From Australia Pending Final Determination of Protection Visa Issues / Interlocutory Notice of Motion; Decision Confined to the Fifth Applicant, With the First to Fourth Applicants Stood Over
Outcome
The notice of motion was dismissed insofar as it was brought by the fifth applicant; the applications of the first to fourth applicants were stood over to a date to be fixed with liberty to apply.
Legal Topics
['protection Visas' 'section 48 a Bar on Further Protection Visa Applications' 'section 48 B Ministerial Discretion' 'interlocutory Relief to Restrain Removal' 'statutory Construction']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visas' 'section 48 a Bar on Further Protection Visa Applications' 'section 48 B Ministerial Discretion' 'interlocutory Relief to Restrain Removal' 'statutory Construction']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Declarations as to the Proper Construction of S 48 a of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) and to Restrain Removal From Australia Pending Final Determination of Protection Visa Issues / Interlocutory Notice of Motion; Decision Confined to the Fifth Applicant, With the First to Fourth Applicants Stood Over

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether s 48A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) should be construed so as not to bar a further protection visa application where circumstances have changed or a new claim is raised.' 'Whether the fifth applicant had a sufficient prima facie case to justify interlocutory relief restraining removal from Australia.']

Ratio Decidendi

The clarity and width of s 48A, expressly subject to s 48B, did not permit the narrowed construction advanced by the fifth applicant; any new or changed claims were matters for s 48B. Because there was no legitimate prima facie issue that s 48A should be read down, the fifth applicant was not entitled to interlocutory relief restraining removal.

Court Disposition

The notice of motion was dismissed insofar as it was brought by the fifth applicant; the applications of the first to fourth applicants were stood over to a date to be fixed with liberty to apply.

Orders

  • ['No member of the public have access to the court file without prior leave of a Judge of the Court.' "The transcript of today's proceedings not be made available to the public without prior leave of a Judge of the Court." 'The applications of the first to fourth applicants be stood over to a date to be fixed.' "The...