Keppitipola, Herath Mudiyanselage Janaka Prebodha & Anor v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 1416
The tribunal gave genuine and realistic consideration to the applicant's claims, made rational credibility findings, and was not obliged to apply a 'What if I am wrong?' test. The applicant failed to show jurisdictional error in the tribunal's process or approach.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Status' 'evidence' 'review of Administrative Decisions']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the tribunal gave genuine and realistic consideration to the applicant's case" "Whether the tribunal was obliged to apply the 'What if I am wrong?' test in assessing the real chance of persecution"]
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal gave genuine and realistic consideration to the applicant's claims, made rational credibility findings, and was not obliged to apply a 'What if I am wrong?' test. The applicant failed to show jurisdictional error in the tribunal's process or approach.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['Application is dismissed with costs, including reserved costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment