NAAF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 17; [2002] FCA 119
No error has been demonstrated in the decision of the primary judge to dismiss the review of the Refugee Review Tribunal's refusal of a protection visa; the grounds advanced by the appellant before the Full Court do not challenge the legal correctness of the judgment below.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Single Judge to Full Court
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review' 'judicial Review' 'application of Migration Act S 91 X']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Single Judge to Full Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the primary judge erred in dismissing the application for review of a decision refusing a protection visa' "Effect of s 91X Migration Act 1958 (Cth) on continued publication of the appellant's name"]
Ratio Decidendi
No error has been demonstrated in the decision of the primary judge to dismiss the review of the Refugee Review Tribunal's refusal of a protection visa; the grounds advanced by the appellant before the Full Court do not challenge the legal correctness of the judgment below.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment