Peiris v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 880
The application fails because, on the Tribunal's factual findings, the harm feared by the applicant was not by reason of political opinion but due to control of a business and personal enmity, and therefore not for a Convention reason; issues as to internal relocation are immaterial.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Manel Alexander Peiris; Second Applicant: Rani Calista Peiris; Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Migration; Judicial Review / Judgment After Hearing of Application for Judicial Review of Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Protection Visa, Refugee Status, Persecution for Political Opinion, Internal Relocation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Manel Alexander Peiris
First Applicant
Rani Calista Peiris
Second Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Migration; Judicial Review / Judgment After Hearing of Application for Judicial Review of Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether persecution due to being a member of a political party necessarily constitutes persecution motivated by political opinion under the Refugees Convention
- 2 Whether the Tribunal made an error of law in its approach to causation and relocation under the Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The application fails because, on the Tribunal's factual findings, the harm feared by the applicant was not by reason of political opinion but due to control of a business and personal enmity, and therefore not for a Convention reason; issues as to internal relocation are immaterial.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application be dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment