Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v 'X' [2002] FCAFC 93; [2002] FCA 386
Cumulatively, the circumstances—including the respondents' status as minors, the Minister's earlier undertaking not to seek costs against a tutor, the changed legal landscape due to a High Court decision after hearing, and a Tribunal error deemed non-contributory to outcome—justify a departure from the usual rule, and the interests of justice are served by ordering that each party bear their own costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment (costs)
- Outcome
- Each party to bear their own costs of the proceeding below and of the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'practice and Procedure' 'refugee Protection Visa' 'exceptional Circumstances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment (costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether exceptional, special or unusual circumstances warrant a departure from the usual rule that costs follow the event in migration appeals']
Ratio Decidendi
Cumulatively, the circumstances—including the respondents' status as minors, the Minister's earlier undertaking not to seek costs against a tutor, the changed legal landscape due to a High Court decision after hearing, and a Tribunal error deemed non-contributory to outcome—justify a departure from the usual rule, and the interests of justice are served by ordering that each party bear their own costs.
Court Disposition
Each party to bear their own costs of the proceeding below and of the appeal.
Orders
- ['Each party bear their own costs of the proceeding below and of the appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment