Jin v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 260

Jin v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 260

A sufficient case for an injunction restraining removal was not made out; the evidence did not cause doubt regarding the admissions relied upon by the Minister, and the short notice, while important, was not determinative in the absence of a stronger case.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 February 2000
Procedural Posture
Application for Injunction / Ex Tempore Judgment on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['visa Cancellation' 'injunction' 'removal From Australia']
['immigration Law'] ['visa Cancellation' 'injunction' 'removal From Australia']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Injunction / Ex Tempore Judgment on Interlocutory Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the court should grant an injunction to restrain the removal of applicants from Australia following visa cancellation']

Ratio Decidendi

A sufficient case for an injunction restraining removal was not made out; the evidence did not cause doubt regarding the admissions relied upon by the Minister, and the short notice, while important, was not determinative in the absence of a stronger case.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application is dismissed.']